Questions and Answers

What sets you apart from the other candidates?

I have been a resident of Norco since February, 2009. But even before I became a resident, I was actively involved in the City, its nonprofits and riding clubs. I decided to run for City Council because I do not like what I see: Hillsides with dead vegetation, ingresses and egresses that are not aesthetically pleasing to draw in visitors, small businesses that are barely scraping by because they lack the foot traffic and clientele to make a sustainable living, inequities within this city, and decisions based on emotion and not sound judgment.

I have six platforms that are very important to me which are all addressed on my website. I have the education, knowledge, skills and abilities to represent this city. I understand the political context, federalism, and the need to work with other governing agencies. Emotions are good if they lead to curiosity; when curiosity leads to knowledge which in turn leads to better decision making. I understand these concepts and how to put them in practice. I understand this is a thankless job, I won’t make everyone happy, I may be required to make hard decision that are unpopular, but I will make them with integrity and transparency. I am running because I love Norco. I want to make a difference, I want to protect this town and its heritage. I want to ensure that we can sustain ourselves and our lifestyle.

I have been teaching leadership in public service and public management and policy for 15 years at CSUF. I serve on several advisory and executive councils that deal with economic development, strong workforce, career technical education and public safety. I have the leadership skills and interpersonal skills to work with others and represent the City of Norco as one of your elected council members.

I am humbled by the support I have already received and would be honored to earn your trust and your vote.

What are your views of our Sheriff’s department? Are you willing to provide the tools, money and support they need to make our community safe?

As a retired law enforcement officer myself, I am avid supporter of law enforcement.

While we hear many communities screaming about defunding the police, I am shouting increase funding as demonstrated on my website, postcards, and mailers. We need to increase funding for public safety by increasing training for our patrol officers, by increasing community awareness and having programs that can help reduce the likelihood of becoming a victim, and by reaffirming our commitment to develop programs that bridge public safety and the community.

According to the Department of Justice and the data compiled through 2018, crime has decreased in Norco by 3% over the last several years. However we are still 7% above the national average in total crime and 15% above the national average in property crimes. Research is telling us that crime will grow (and has grown) especially now in this time of COVID. Currently we have 32,000 people that were issued Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notifications (WARN Notices) since March. These lay-offs are temporary, permanent and unknown. Businesses are closing and it will take a 4-12 week window to get back to work. We are also seeing the escalation of violent protests throughout the nation. Criminologists identify this as strain theory and social disorganization theory and when people cannot afford their needs and wants they have a higher tendency to commit crime. I am absolutely in support of ensuring that the residents of this town are protected.

This requires more, not less. This requires more supported hours of service per day and not less. This requires more funding and no cutbacks. This also means that our equivalency rate of sworn personnel positions should not be reduced.

We also need to invest in technology and real time cameras to help law enforcement investigate and solve crimes. Recently these cameras showed their value when the suspect in the Norco robbery at the convenience store on Hamner last month was caught in Barstow. It was surveillance cameras that captured the license of the vehicle in Norco when it fled, and the automated license plate readers used by Barstow Police to identify the suspect’s vehicle days later.

As a retired police officer, and a professor in criminal justice, I support our men and women that work in law enforcement and public safety.

Norco needs revenue. How will you as a council member bring in new businesses, help promote local events, and support our unique small businesses? While controlling the amount of large corporate take overs of our large plots of land?

It goes without saying that since March we have all been overwhelmed with this COVID-19 Pandemic. Our businesses are struggling. As a member of the Economic Development Advisory Council, we collectively collaborated together over the last several months, designed, and presented to council this last month a program to help small businesses, known as the SEAL Program. BUT that is not enough. Norco needs to continue to find ways to stimulate its economy through economic development in a variety of business, services, retail and recreational events – We need to find innovative ways to bring other businesses, vacationers, trade shows and events to Norco to offset the City’s rising expenses. We need to develop ourselves into a diversified destination city offering a variety of amenities.

We bring in new businesses and local events by having a city that is clean, aesthetically pleasing, friendly, embraces diverse activities and lifestyles, promotes our area attractions, dining, shopping, nightlife, and our community organizations. It’s about marketing.

We need to recognize the 2,300 businesses in this town and make a conscious effort to patronize these businesses. We need to use local developers that live here and understand our lifestyle and build according to our community needs, not the wants of others.

We live in a recreational community but the costs and cost recovery in this town is not working in our favor. The only positive cost recovery in this town is recreational programs and youth sports. Our facility rentals, event center, and field usage are only earning on average 64% of the cost which is unacceptable. We need to find ways to bring more events into this town to at least break even if not make a profit which in turn can go back into the town’s infrastructure. As a city council and with the help of our commissions and advisory councils, we need to brainstorm, understanding that no idea should be discounted until fully vetted. Allow all suggestions to be placed on the “white board” and then begin the conversation on how to turn ideas into realities. I have been told in the past by representatives of this city that we could not entertain events such as the stockyards in Fort Worth, our developing a semblance of Old Town Temecula, Pasadena or Orange in Norco. Why not? As a member of city council I will listen to everyone’s ideas, and let’s turn the best feasible ideas into reality.

We need to support our small businesses with giving them the tools and resources to foster growth and build assets in our community such as tax exempt industrial development bonds, small business administration loans, on-line training programs, micro loans, business assistance grant programs, webinars, assistance for business planning, marketing, funding and management. These are all services that are available through Riverside County. As a member of the Executive Council of the Inland Empire Desert Consortium we collaborate about strong workforce. We discuss and make recommendations about economic development.

We need to build and market our city and our unique lifestyle in such a way to draw others in neighboring communities to shop and dine in Norco.

As for the final portion of your question, how to control the amount of large corporate take overs of our large plots of land.

First and foremost, we cannot control who purchases property for sale or who sells property to whom. Attempting to prevent anyone from purchasing land could lead to litigation. However, when a person or entity purchases property there is a responsibility to understand any deed restrictions that may be attached to the property. However, we must be aware of State mandates that could severe these deed restrictions. We need to be ahead of the legislative game. We have to be forward thinkers, thinking about their next move before they make it and have a counter that will not get us in trouble. We have to rely on our commissions and legal counsel to direct us in the right direction to protect the city and make sound decisions not ones of emotion.

How will you as a council member make sure your personal opinion does not persuade your vote if it is what the majority want?

I am a pragmatic and will hold true to my values of morals, ethics and honor. I will not compromise my integrity. I will not dishonor this city by making decisions that are not based on sound judgement. I am courageous and brave and at times even a risk taker by being brutally honest. I base my decisions on research, past experience, knowledge, the sensible input from others; not emotion. I ponder, digest, research and then and only then make decisions based on sound judgement in a timely manner. I will stay aligned with the best interests of this city and its residents. I will own the fear to stand up to others if I believe they are making poor decisions or put our city in jeopardy. As your elected official, I work for you. This is not about me, it is about the residents of this city and what I can bring to the table with my years of experience, knowledge, skills and abilities to ensure the sustainability of our beloved community. I have the willingness to listen and work with everyone. I would be honored and humbled to represent you as one of your next Norco City Council Members.

How will you help Norconians reduce these cost to help maintain our rural lifestyle? At these high prices many cannot afford the cost of having livestock.

Let me begin by allowing the elephant out of the room right away – we as a community are wasteful and lazy about using the right disposal bins for our trash. Not everyone, but enough to make this a problem for us all. Recently at a council meeting, and because of the complaints of our trash and water fees, Robin Grundmeyer spoke about her recent visit to Viramontes to visually inspect the manure waste they received from Norco and was appalled by all the other “trash” that was found. This is a problem.

How do we address it? First and foremost, we need to educate the community where they need to dispose of their waste and in which bin to lessen the need to “clean” our trash and the reasons why. A public service announcement. This could reduce our costs if we separate our trash and recycle properly. There is also a difference between how we define “trash”: Household goods, green waste, recycling, construction materials, organic, manure, etc. and we need a full understanding and the ability to dispose of it correctly.

Now to your question – Yes, we pay higher than normal rates and our 2 cubic yard manure bin and scout fees are more than $169/mo. Norconians can lower their rates by determining what type of manure bin disposal they require. Some will pay the rate for the 2 cubic yard bin for convenience, but Ted is right when he wrote that Norconians can lower their rate by using the 96 gallon carts instead. The problem here – how many residents knew they could have up to four of the 96 gallon bins? It’s about education and having that conversation about alternative ways of disposing of the manure.

Legislative requirements dating back to 2000 have caused our water and waste disposal bills to increase. Title 14 outlines litter reduction by recycling beverage containers. It also regulates nonhazardous waste. Title 25 addresses our water resources. Current statutes have forced disposal companies to raise their rates. Effective Jan., 2022, SB 1383 will put even more restraints on how we dispose of our waste and will require additional bins provided by our disposal company. Here is a link to a Youtube video about SB1383: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-enW7SgSt1U&feature=youtu.be

This is where the city council will need to educate themselves and then have meaningful conversations and negotiations with waste disposal companies. How many companies handle manure? Where does the manure need to go? Which landfill or compost company? With our current contract expiring in 2024, we should begin the process of locating disposal companies that can provide the same service. Put the contract out for bid. But here is the other side of it – most companies, like Waste Management, will require an exclusive contract, greater than an few years in length. As with most utility companies, they have an enormous cost outlay for cities they service. Having the exclusive contract allows them to spread out the fixed costs and create a reasonable price for us the consumer. Now for some good news, and again this is where education comes to the forefront, in 1996, the Department of Justice put an end to solid waste hauling and disposal companies from participating in monopolistic practices and put a stop to long-term contracts with dumpster customers. It’s this type of information that may help negotiate better pricing for the residents but it only works if you have members on council and in city government that understand and willing to educate themselves on this matter. You can read the DOJ’s press release by going to this link: https://www.justice.gov/archive/atr/public/press_releases/1996/0527.htm.

As for water and our water bill – The cost associated with the infrastructure of our water systems are collected through user fees. This rate is determined by the City and is up for review next year. As with everything, state government also plays a role. The State Water Resources Control Board maintains urban water use reporting requirements and oversees the water usage in California. Years ago the city realized that they were not able to cover the expenses associated with this needed lifesaving commodity. As such, they hired a consulting firm to analyze the City’s water rates and accepted the recommendation from this firm to adjust the rates to ensure the city could cover the expenses associated with water usage, but more importantly the infrastructure of our water system. One thing to note, water rates are not based solely on water usage. They encompass sewer pipes, the cost of reservoirs, water towers, pipes, the transport from rivers, treatment facilities, etc. There a lot of government entities involved in the pricing. As said before, it comes down to education; understanding the intricacies and the political context that goes into running a city and addressing the rising costs of our utilities.

Let’s work together and find ways to lower the costs for our residents with education and the cost savings available. I am willing to listen and work with everyone. Feel free to visit my website where many more questions from residents have been asked and answered: sigridwilliams.com. I would be honored and humbled to represent you as one of your next Norco City Council Members.

If you have a personal interest in a current project and your vote would be affected due to the personal interest will you have the integrity to preclude yourself from the vote?

Absolutely, yes! It is only fitting and just to recuse yourself from any project when a person has a vested interest in that project. Not only is it the right thing to do, it is also required by many government agencies including the Departmental Ethics Office. The US Department of the Interior states, “…you may not work on an assignment that you know will affect your own financial interests or the financial interests of your spouse or your minor child. The prohibition also applies if you know the assignment will affect the financial interests of: your general partner; an organization that you serve as an officer, director, employee, general partner, or trustee; or someone with whom you have an arrangement for employment, or with whom you are negotiating for employment” (Departmental Ethics Office). This is laid out quite nicely on the following two websites: https://www.doi.gov/ethics/conflicts, and https://www.doi.gov/ethics/recusal-best-practices-for-doi-employees. These principles fall in line with any government agency.

"I would like to know her position on BLM and how she would handle their demands from the City of Norco."

I assume you are referring to Black Lives Matter. I am not in favor of any organization that prides itself on civil disobedience and Marxist ideology. Initially when this organization was formed it was to bring light to the violence that was brought about on black communities; black men at the hands of others from different races, specifically Trayvon Martin. It has evolved into much more. They have gone as far as recently changing their website removing their mission statement that was visible less than a month ago. Now their message incorporates the need to protest racial injustice.

I have not seen or heard that "BLM" has made any "demands" from the City of Norco.

Let us be thankful that we live in a country that allows us the right to speak our minds and protest knowing we are protected under the First Amendment, even those with radical ideas or ideas that are different than ours.

In closing, much of what we have seen in the last two months stems from the death of George Floyd. His death was a travesty. The officers that participated in his death have given a black eye to every law enforcement officer, their departments and this honorable profession. There is no room for such behavior and these officers should be held accountable.

Thank you for reaching out to me. Feel free to contact me if you have any other questions.

I hope I can earn your trust, and your vote.

"Why was it that you wrote the "con" feature to R?"

When I wrote the argument against Measure R it was not against the city or our lifestyle. It was to educate the residents that a ballot measure to raise taxes was being presented for certain funding purposes but was not going to be absolutely earmarked; it was going into the general fund. In other words, give us the money and we promise to spend it as we said we would.

One of my biggest concerns centered around having these funds not "earmarked". Here again, it would not ensure that the raised sales tax revenues would be used for their intended purposes. It would allow our council and city manager to reallocate those funds elsewhere and we would have nothing to say about it unless we repealed the Measure. I wrote in the argument that our city needed to present a tax measure to its residents with absolute transparency, and that the new tax revenue needed to be restricted to those items stated in the City's proposal. It's one thing to make a promise, it is another to hold up to that promise.

As you know, Measure R was passed by the majority of voters, and yes, to date, the money is being spent on items that were stated in the City's proposal. I believe the dialog that transpired from my writings, and a meeting with the City Manager and other staffers after I submitted the argument against Measure R, helped hold them accountable. Overall, the Measure R Committee has done a wonderful job with their recommendations. Watchdogs, like me, will hold our city accountable should the funds by allocated elsewhere or used in any other manner than to supplement the city's budget.

I hope this satisfies your interest in why I wrote the argument against Measure R. If you have any other questions, please feel free to reach out to me.

I remember meeting you when I was running for Council in 2015 at the Norco Fair. You had asked me about ADA compliance on the horse trail system and I did not have a solid answer then but told you it was an issue I would have to research. So now that you are in the same position as I was what are your thoughts about it?

The City will be required to become ADA compliant, its just when. In 1990 the Federal Government passed the Americans with Disability Act. The California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), the Unruh Civil Rights Act, and the Disabled Persons Act are state laws that protect people from discrimination based on disability. Recently this year the ADA was reaffirmed and now there is a commitment to the basic civil rights of all people with disabilities. It is estimated that 25% of our population has a disability thus we need to ensure that we are not putting ourselves in the line of litigation and class action lawsuits under social justice by not conforming. This is something I teach in my university Human Resource Management class.

Measure R was initially presented as a need for infrastructure funding but in order to get it to pass the City decided to add public safety into the mix. During the 1 year of adhoc study on the needs public safety was never addressed nor was it ever part of the financial equation. Now that it passed do you feel the funds are being properly allocated? Thoughts on how to deal with Ingalls and the financial deficit annually?

As I am sure you are aware, I wrote the argument against Measure R but it was not against the city or our lifestyle. It was to educate the residents that a ballot measure to raise taxes was being presented for certain funding purposes but was not going to be absolutely earmarked; it was going into the general fund. In other words, give us the money and we promise to spend it as we said we would.

As you know, Measure R was passed by the majority of voters, and yes, to date, the money is being spent on items that were stated in the City's proposal, however you are right, public safety while addressed has not been approved by the city council. One of the reasons public safety is part of my platform. I believe the dialog that transpired from my writings, and a meeting with the City Manager and other staffers after I submitted the argument against Measure R, helped hold them accountable. Overall, the Measure R Committee has done a wonderful job with their recommendations. Watchdogs, like me, will hold our city accountable should the funds by allocated elsewhere or used in any other manner than to supplement the city's budget. It was never intended to replace a line item and I will continue to remind them of that point.

With the Covid crisis there will be revenue shortfalls. I believe this year the City had a budget deficit of $1.3 million and again has tapped into its reserves to balance the budget. Do you have any ideas on how the City could generate more revenue or make any necessary cuts? I personally tried to think outside the box and bring something new to town ie.. the mountain bike racing series and you saw that went. What are your ideas on increasing revenue during this trying times of Covid?

You are correct, the City will be operating at a deficit this year. However, their reserve is about 2.5 times the amount required so as a City we are in good shape. EDAC is having conversations on how to stimulate our small businesses right now. The City is typically driving the conversation on what they would like us to cover and discuss. Today, I would like them to spend more money and hire the right person/people to work in planning to handle permits. Currently there is such a back log and I hear it from residents and developers alike. If we could streamline the process, then building will take place, more will appreciate our town and retail will be built sooner rather than later and revenue will be generated. Bringing people to this city will require an aesthetically pleasing and friendly atmosphere. To increase revenue during this Covid time means we need to promote our businesses in town. We need to rally together and do everything we can to keep the money in Norco. A friendly city is a welcoming city.

In the past there is a mentality of of being a "team player" and go along with the vote on issues or get bullied by a few of the other Council members. Do you feel you are capable to vote on an issue that may not be popular, may not be how your fellow Council members want you to vote, or may have a negative impact on yourself?

I will NOT be bullied or pressured into siding with others to be part of the "in crowd". I am a problem solver, researcher, educator and informer. I will always do my due diligence and make a decision not based on my feelings but what is in the best interest of this City. I am a pragmatic. There have been several conversations that I have fielded in the last few months that do not meet the popular sentiments of some, but it's not about me and it's not about them. It's about all Norconians and making sure that this city survives and flourishes for the next generations to come. This sentiment may cost me an election, but I will stand by my integrity, my vision of sustainability for this city, and will stand up to anyone that attempts me to side one way against my beliefs.

What are your thoughts on the Silverlake? Do you feel that refunding the deposits were the right decision by Council despite the deviation from actually building the equestrian amenities? Thoughts on a former Council member taking employment with Silverlakes when she left office?

To dissect Silverlakes again and again is not healthy. The contact and lease is in place. However, when Balboa Management Company first approached Norco I truly believe they had every intention to build a world class equestrian center. But let's look at everything. It was no secret that it was supposed to be Silverlakes Equestrian and Sports Park. When Balboa did not lose their lease on the property in San Juan Capistrano, they knew it would be foolish to move their equestrian center to Norco. Balboa is not in the business to lose money. So they did the next best thing for them - they built a world class sports park and put the equestrian part to the side for future development. Norconians are upset. I am upset that it did not go as planned. But let's also be honest and ask ourselves, how many Norconians would have used those facilities and paid for them when they have pocket parks, neighborhood arenas and George Ingalls Equestrian Event Center in their backyard? When Kathy Acevedo left city council she had every right to find employment elsewhere. She is the only one that can tell why she accepted a position - a few ideas: Maybe she needed a job and that one presented itself to her. The appearance of impropriety is a concern, yes I agree however, let's look at the other side: Kathy Acevedo has always been about this town, maybe it was her way of embedding herself into Balboa Management's ear to ensure they follow through with their original plans. I do not know Kathy Acevedo well enough to make a determination, but what I saw fifteen years ago and up until two years ago when she became very ill was a person with a heart for Norco. Every event and every parade she was a part of, you would see her riding her horse and promoting our town.

What can you bring to the table as a member of the City Council? What do you think is lacking on Norco City Council?

I will bring my years of experience working in public service and my formal education. I understand the political context and bureaucracy because I work in it and primarily because I teach it. I am a critical thinker and will not make a decision without fully understanding what is needed, not for today but for the future of Norco. I will make decision based on sound judgment and not emotion. Currently I believe this council is playing the game of chess one move at a time instead of thinking of the future. I believe this council is making decisions that are reactive instead of proactive. I will only be one of five making decisions, but educating and informing my colleagues will be my strong point on council. I believe I have the leadership skills to make a difference.

What are your thoughts on LMD's? A few LMD's are running a deficit and services are being cut to balance their budgets so what are your thoughts on how to deal with them?

I am not well versed on LMD's because they were implemented well before I moved to Norco. What I do know is the LMD's were put into place when Norco Hills was first developed with an added cost put on the homeowners for landscaping maintenance. Right up front, I have a concern that while a resident purchasing a home may understand their responsibility, when a home is lost or abandoned the mortgage company that is now the legal owner is not obligated to absorb that fee or will fight the added fee associated with the LMD. I imagine this was part of the problem with the deficits that these five tracts are experiencing. What is more problematic, is the owners that have paid into the LMDs are now disenfranchised because they are not receiving the services they were promised. This will surely become a talking point for me when elected. I believe in equality, but more so equity. What is nice about this, I do NOT live in the hills and realize there is a problem.

There is still the "good ole boy" mentality within the town and a very small group of people that have a tremendous amount of influence over other residents that do not have the time or do not wish to research issues. During my run for Council they came to me and suggested I distance myself from certain people in town. My response was I am running to represent all not just those folks I get along with. How would you deal with that?

I understand that some have a tremendous amount of influence in this town. My influence will come through educating this town and informing them of what will happen if we continue to be reactive instead of proactive. I like to think of it as a chess game, I am not about the move I'm about to make, but thinking about the moves in the future. A chess player will tell you if you are only working the next move, and not predicting what's next, you lose. I refuse to lose.

Ca and many Cities have an issue with voter turnout. Hence the State passed SB415 forcing the election cycle to be moved in Cities who had low voter turnout. After speaking with many in town they felt their vote didn't matter, decisions are already made by Council before the meeting ever happened. The City is divided into 3 sectors (old town, hills and bluffs) what are your thoughts on how to encourage voters to participate and to make them feel that their input and vote do matter?

I beg to differ that votes do not count. Every vote counts and whether the vote is for me for Norco City Council or others, at the county, state or federal level, every person has a civic duty to vote. Recently a video was presented by the Riverside County Registrars office that outlines what we will be doing in this county. Executive Order N-64-20 and N-67-20 outlines the process which will make it easier for everyone to vote by mail or in person.

Visit: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQY72ZAZe-I for the election update.

I have heard like you that decisions are made behind closed doors. However, our Council members have 100s of pages of material that they go through well before the meetings and yes, that alone would render the idea that they have made up their mind before an actual meeting or vote takes place. Voters can make their voices be heard by reading those pages when they are published 4-5 days before the meeting and making comments either in person or through the mail before the meetings take place. Our constituents need to participate in the governing process.

Now that the meetings are available live, residents should be watching, but I can tell you I have't seen one with more than 12 of us watching at any given time. You can be rest assured that I will make all my decisions very transparent and will listen to the voices of the residents of this town. I will listen, absorb, do my due diligence, and then and only then make a decision. AND my decisions will not be driven by emotion, rather by sound judgment always looking out for the best interest of this town.

My Committee and I will be walking through these neighborhoods and having meet and greets at the pocket parks. I want them to know that I will be representing all of Norco and not one neighborhood. Part of our plan will include educating everyone about the privilege we currently have to elect our officials and the rights afforded to us.

How do you feel about coyotes?

Coyotes are a species of canine and are carnivorous which makes them less than desirable in a populated area with other animals, specifically the smaller ones. However, coyotes serve a purpose within our ecosystem and when encroached upon, they become defensive and aggressive. We need to educate ourselves and be proactive to prevent potential dangerous actions. Here is a website that discusses preventative measures to keep you and your animals safe.

Visit: https://urbancoyoteresearch.com/coyote-info/how-avoid-conflicts-coyotes

How do you feel about the power lines planned for the riverbed?

I am personally not in favor of power lines overhead especially after those horrific fires the last few years that were blamed on SCE. However, to put them underground very well may upset the ecosystem of the riverbed and that may be much worse in the long run. We also have to be aware that these lines do not run through property owned by Norco, so truly we have no say. BUT - educating and learning as much as we can and staying informed by being actively engaged will allow us to feel better about whatever decision is made by the Army Corp. of Engineers, the City of Riverside and Jurupa Valley.

How will you manage Katherine Aleman and the element she plans to bring should she be elected?

I am not in a position to "manage" anyone but myself. Ms. Aleman has a right to voice her concerns as anyone else, guaranteed to us under the First Amendment. While I will not condone her methods, she has a right to be heard (as we all do) and council has an obligation to listen.

How do you feel about defunding the police?

I believe we need to increase police training, patrol training, and ongoing training of our police officers. We need officers that understand not only the function of enforcing the law, but also the need to deter crime, preserve the peace, and provide a service. Law enforcement has been tasked to handle criminals, the homeless, and the poor. We shouldn't defund, we need to increase their budgets so they can become the experts of the streets and keep us all safe.

What is your political affiliation and priorities?

This is a nonpartisan election and it is not about political affiliation, it is about who can serve on council with sound judgment and the ability to make tough decisions to keep Norco out of litigation and sustainable for our future generations. My priorities include:

Preserving our rural, animal keeping lifestyle
Building a stronger infrastructure
Stimulating our economy through economic development including small businesses
Increase public safety
Empower our nonprofits and use them to offset the costs to our City by having them participate in trail cleanups similar to the efforts of Norco Horseman's Association
Educate and Inform - By far one of the most important because when people are informed, better decisions are made.

What is it called for zoom, two identification authorization? You said it so smoothly.

Zoom is a platform to conduct meetings with small and large groups. The two identification authorization would require a person to register for the meeting to prevent a zoom bomber from hijacking a meeting or dropping in unsolicited offensive material. This is done by the host and the host will welcome those wishing to participate by sending the zoom contact information to the email on file. The host also has the ability to prevent the sharing of the screen to anyone other than themselves or those given authorization to do so. Similar to the required mathematical question at the bottom of my website pages to ensure it is a real person requesting information, etc. instead of the robo-solicitor.

How do you feel about people building homes so close to the wilderness it encroaches and then they blame the wildlife?

Every person purchasing property should do their due diligence. Shame on anyone who does not research before they buy. Individuals that purchase property at the bottom of a mountain range should know that rain, snow, and mudslides are a high probability because of their location. Here in Norco we live in a 500 year flood plain. That doesn't mean that it will be 500 years before we have a flood, it can happen anytime, but it says there is a probability within some 500 year span, Norco would be under water. Those that choose to build homes near the wilderness areas should expect and they will have to live with the wild animals. It surely does not mean that once they build and move in that the animals should go. They have to learn to live together.

Ingrid- I was just sent a picture- you went to the march with the counter protester group?

I was there. Mike and I said hello to a few people before it even started. Then Mike and I went across the street on the side of City Hall and we stood and watched. As a Criminal Justice professor, I wanted to see what was going on 1st hand because these will be topics that we are covering in class this semester. We also drove into Eastvale when they had their protest, again to watch and observe. I teach about our constitutional rights and civil rights. It's only right I see it first hand and be able to lead a discussion than to teach based on hearsay.

How do you feel about what the Teachers Union is doing these days?

I am assuming your question comes after a post appeared on Norco News Now (Uncensored) where circled under CTA it states, "Across multiple platforms, we have seen the response for "All Lives Matter" and "Blue Lives Matter" which we do not condone or accept." This was originally posted in the June/July 2020 California Educator magazine on page 7 and 8. http://educator.cta.org/i/1259894-june-july-2020/8

When I initially saw the post, I was appalled. My first reaction included disgust that CTA would blatantly support one group/platform and condemn others based on conjecture. However, when you research you find the post was commentary, an opinion, by someone identifying themselves as Student CTA. While I do not always agree with the Teacher's Union or support their stance on quite a few issues, they are making strides towards social justice in the sense of providing quality education for all students in California. They are advocating for our students and faculty. Over the summer Norco College created a Racial Justice Taskforce which I joined so I can become better educated. We met weekly, listened to stories, discussed racial inequality and conceived injustices, and now after three months, we are researching, gathering data, in hopes of being able to have deep conversations and make changes based on research to ensure all students are served in an equitable fashion, again based on research. In the same publication Susan Stratton stated, "We as educators can do much to shift perceptions in our society but it will take a commitment and well thought out plan of action. Not just words." Well thought out plans take time. A 12 line opinion, is just that, an opinion to be taken for face value. Not everyone will agree and many will hate. BUT it does open a door for a conversation. I insist that my students at the college and university become critical thinkers and listen to the opinions of others. They (and I) may not always agree, but there is something to be learned from all sides. We call this personal and professional growth.

I hope this answer brings light and satisfies your thirst for answers. I welcome the opportunity to earn your trust and your vote for city council.

Followup: Hi Sigrid. Thank you for your response. I also believe in racial justice seeing how we are a mixed family. What I do not understand is, why haven't our children been treated equally all along? Why all of a sudden has this become an issue when it should have never been an issue in the first place? What will you do differently?

My concern with the Teachers Union, and what I wanted your opinion on, is how do you feel about this. " Unified Teachers Los Angeles and San Bernardo union's, are requiring things like federal bail out, medicare for all, wealth and millionaire tax, defund police, charter school moratorium, and financial support for undocumented students to effectively teach in person."

I guess I should have been more clear about that LOL. I see some value in some of these things, but not all, and I would like your opinion.

To your first three questions - I don't have the answer as to why they haven't. This is out of my realm as I grew up in a very diverse neighborhood, had partners and currently have friends of all races. I was brought up to treat everyone equally. I am now having to educate myself and attempt to find a reason. The issue factor - politics, the Pandemic, injustice, media, and culture. There is a lot going on right now, people have time on their hands and are willing to drive change. What would I do differently? I'm educating myself. I am participating in hard conversations with others, and researching to hopefully find solutions and then have a dialog with others to build a better, stronger society that everyone feels welcomed in.

Now to your Union questions - I do not agree with any organization (union or otherwise) to make demands. That creates a hostile environment and little is achieved Wanting to have a lively dialog to create change is another story. I am not a proponent of bail outs. I have no problem assisting someone or some entity, but not bailing them out. Bail outs do not solve problems they mask problems and then they turn into larger problems. We need to fix the problems first. Medicare for all, millionaire tax, etc. this all falls well outside local government. Charter schools have their place, very similar to private schools. These schools should be held under the same credentialing requirements as public schools. If a person is going to be a teacher, instructor, educator, etc. they need to be properly credentialed. As for the DACA and Dreamers, no child here in the United States should be without an education. BUT before we can fix the problem with undocumented children in our schools, the government needs to fix the immigration and naturalization process. As with my parents and many others that I know, it shouldn't take ten years to become a naturalized citizen, especially when done the right way.

Finally, I am beside myself when I hear the teacher's union demand the defunding of our police. If anything, we need to increase funding. Today's officers are wearing so many hats; they have to enforce the law, prevent/deter crime, apprehend suspects, deal with the mentally ill, the addicts and the homeless, and provide emergency services. They have to be enforcers, disciplinarians, teachers, corner store psychologists and a lot more. They do this with 5-6 months of academy and field training. They are generalists in criminal law, not specialists. We need more funding to provide the necessary tools and training these officers need to do their jobs and subsequent training in other humanity and social sciences so they get a full perspective of our society and understand what is needed to perform efficiently and effectively. As I explain to my students, today's law enforcement officers must handle society's dirty work. No matter what the conflict or issue might be, it is law enforcement that is called to handle these concerns.

Social Media Post: Sigrid wrote: Over the summer Norco College created a Racial Justice Taskforce which I joined so I can become better educated. We met weekly, listened to stories, discussed racial inequality and conceived injustices, and now after three months, we are researching, gathering data, in hopes of being able to have deep conversations and make changed based on research to ensure all students are served in an equitable fachion, again based on research. In the same publication, Susan Stratton stated, “We as educators can do much to shift perceptions in our society but it will take a committment and well thought out plans and take time.” A 12 line opinion, is just that, an opinion to be taken for face value. Not everyone will agree and many will hate. BUT it does open a door for a conversation. I insist that my students at the college and univeristy become critical thinkers and listen to the opinions of others. They (and me) may not always agree, bt there is somerhing to be learned from all sides. We call this personal and profesional growth.

This post was part of an original email sent to me to which I replied. See the entire post below:

How do you feel about what the Teachers Union is doing these days?

When I initially saw the post, I was appalled. My first reaction included disgust that CTA would blatantly support one group/platform and condemn others based on conjecture. However, when you research you find the post was commentary, an opinion, by someone identifying themselves as Student CTA. While I do not always agree with the Teacher's Union or support their stance on quite a few issues, they are making strides towards social justice in the sense of providing quality education for all students in California. They are advocating for our students and faculty. Over the summer Norco College created a Racial Justice Taskforce which I joined so I can become better educated. We met weekly, listened to stories, discussed racial inequality and conceived injustices, and now after three months, we are researching, gathering data, in hopes of being able to have deep conversations and make changes based on research to ensure all students are served in an equitable fashion, again based on research. In the same publication Susan Stratton stated, "We as educators can do much to shift perceptions in our society but it will take a commitment and well thought out plan of action. Not just words." Well thought out plans take time. A 12 line opinion, is just that, an opinion to be taken for face value. Not everyone will agree and many will hate. BUT it does open a door for a conversation. I insist that my students at the college and university become critical thinkers and listen to the opinions of others. They (and I) may not always agree, but there is something to be learned from all sides. We call this personal and professional growth.

Follow-up:

I joined for three reasons: 1) I am a professor at Norco College in Adminstration of Justice and a lecturer at Cal State Fulelrton in Political Science, Public Administration and Criminal Justice, 2) I was asked to be part of the task force, and 3) I’ll be damned if someone was going to attempt to change the criminal justice curriculum without me having a say in it.

What is your political affiliation?

I am, and have been, a registered Republican for the last 37 years. This can be verified by the County Registrar’s Office. However, this is a nonpartisan election for city council. As such, while I may be a republican, my leadership skills afford me the ability to work with everyone. My election committee is made up of both Republicans and Democrats. I want to hear from Norconians whether conservative or liberal and do what is right for this town. It’s not about being right or wrong, left or right, it’s about doing the right thing to preserve and sustain this rural lifestyle we love so much.

With 8,000 people eligible for release from CA prisons to help stem the transmission of COVID-19, how, if at all, would your office aid these Californians and their families in navigating reentry? (Source: League of Women Voters of California and Elect Justice CA)

Social reintegration of ex-prisoners is a primary concern of mine as these individuals will be released into our communities and will face a wide array of social, economic and personal challenges. We need to work with our community college to give them the opportunity to learn a trade, and other organizations to ensure that these individuals can focus on the challenges of reintegration including transition programs, educational programs, treatment programs, and employment services.

These individuals will need to learn a skill set as soon as possible to enter into the workforce. However, it needs to go beyond merely providing them with a job, they will need stable, worthwhile employment that allows them to earn a livable wage, become a productive member of their community, and reduce their likelihood to recidivate. We need to partner with others to provide education, employment, accommodations, substance abuse programs, mental health resources, social and motivational skills training designed to integrate them back into the community with as few challenges and roadblocks.

These programs require collaboration among all interested groups and must allow for flexibility because a “one stop shop” will not work. It is our civic duty as elected council members to ensure that all measures are taken to protect our community, facilitate the social reintegration of ex-prisoners, and reduce the likelihood of reoffending. Facilitating community engagement, focusing on their needs can develop a smoother transition back into society however, a great deal of collaboration and research will need to be done, to do it right.

Does your office have any plans to include currently or formerly incarcerated people in your decision-making process as it relates to criminal justice issues? What would that look like? (Source: League of Women Voters of California and Elect Justice CA)

The City has a working relationship with the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to provide community service to the city by those incarcerated. I am unaware of any plans nor have I heard that the city will include current or formerly incarcerated people in their decision making processes as they relate to criminal justice issues. I am running as a first time candidate and have not heard of any such plans.

If the City Council would take on this added responsibility, I imagine it would not only include current or formerly imprisoned individuals, but also professionals and subject matter experts in the field of criminal justice, education, mental health, homelessness, and substance abuse. It would include round table discussions, collaboration, information gathering, community input, and research.

COUNTING DOWN TO

Election Day